<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Farewell, Windows 7.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sprocket.io/blog/2009/04/farewell-windows-7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sprocket.io/blog/2009/04/farewell-windows-7/</link>
	<description>thomas stromberg on technology, nature, and motorcycles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 12:16:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2-RC4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: criminologyc3032</title>
		<link>http://sprocket.io/blog/2009/04/farewell-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-4210</link>
		<dc:creator>criminologyc3032</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 17:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sprocket.io/blog/?p=1469#comment-4210</guid>
		<description>&lt;br&gt;Yes I agree with you this blog contents are really worth reading. Such a good blog to visit. I will recommend it to my friends.
&lt;br&gt; ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I agree with you this blog contents are really worth reading. Such a good blog to visit. I will recommend it to my friends.<br />
<br /> &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toxygen</title>
		<link>http://sprocket.io/blog/2009/04/farewell-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-3999</link>
		<dc:creator>toxygen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sprocket.io/blog/?p=1469#comment-3999</guid>
		<description>just 2 quick notes:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://it.slashdot.org/story/09/08/07/150257/Microsoft-Denies-Windows-7-Showstopper-Bug&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://it.slashdot.org/story/09/08/07/150257/Mi...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/02/16/2259257/Draconian-DRM-Revealed-In-Windows-7&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/02/16/2259257...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wonder what will be leopard like in this order</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just 2 quick notes:<br /><a href="http://it.slashdot.org/story/09/08/07/150257/Microsoft-Denies-Windows-7-Showstopper-Bug" rel="nofollow">http://it.slashdot.org/story/09/08/07/150257/Mi&#8230;</a><br /><a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/02/16/2259257/Draconian-DRM-Revealed-In-Windows-7" rel="nofollow">http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/02/16/2259257&#8230;</a></p>
<p>I wonder what will be leopard like in this order</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://sprocket.io/blog/2009/04/farewell-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-3960</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 02:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sprocket.io/blog/?p=1469#comment-3960</guid>
		<description>I still can&#039;t believe they didn&#039;t ship with SSH out of the box. Practically every other seriouse operating system does this, even the not so seriouse ones do. Why doesn&#039;t microsoft include an SSH server by default, or a decent client. I&#039;d be happy if they just ported the BSD versions of these tools.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is this really just a unix user gripe? I can&#039;t imagine that Windows-culture admins relish having to install, sometimes quite old and buggy, third party support for this at every install.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still can&#39;t believe they didn&#39;t ship with SSH out of the box. Practically every other seriouse operating system does this, even the not so seriouse ones do. Why doesn&#39;t microsoft include an SSH server by default, or a decent client. I&#39;d be happy if they just ported the BSD versions of these tools.</p>
<p>Is this really just a unix user gripe? I can&#39;t imagine that Windows-culture admins relish having to install, sometimes quite old and buggy, third party support for this at every install.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://sprocket.io/blog/2009/04/farewell-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-3956</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 01:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sprocket.io/blog/?p=1469#comment-3956</guid>
		<description>One of the biggest gotchas with the WoW64 architectures on 64-bit windows servers involves applications requiring ODBC connections (unfortunately they are as prolific as ever).  There are now two different versions of the ODBC client and determining which one to use can be a pain depending on the data source.   To setup a DSN for 32-bit application you must use: /WINDIR/SysWOW64/odbcad32.exe.  For 64-bit application you must use:  /WINDIR/System32/odbcad32.exe.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now you&#039;ve got me curious enough to run Windows 7 because I want to know if this 32-bit DSN support is carried over from the 64-bit servers and Vista.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the biggest gotchas with the WoW64 architectures on 64-bit windows servers involves applications requiring ODBC connections (unfortunately they are as prolific as ever).  There are now two different versions of the ODBC client and determining which one to use can be a pain depending on the data source.   To setup a DSN for 32-bit application you must use: /WINDIR/SysWOW64/odbcad32.exe.  For 64-bit application you must use:  /WINDIR/System32/odbcad32.exe.</p>
<p>Now you&#39;ve got me curious enough to run Windows 7 because I want to know if this 32-bit DSN support is carried over from the 64-bit servers and Vista.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

