Comments on: New Business Card?

By: Gorski

Gorski — Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:02:14 +0000

But… but… it’s not ITU-T E.123 compliant! (:

peace,

–me

whose preferred format is in violation of E.123 §7.2 anyways

By: Thomas Stromberg

Thomas Stromberg — Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:48:47 +0000

Yeah, I did accidentally leave out the last digit of my phone number. Part of me wants to do uname -v in BSD style:

Thomas R.0-STROMBERG +1 678.608.0428 thomas@stromberg.org:/sys/adm/linux

But it would just be weird (though interesting) having a BSD uname on a business card where my title is otherwise.

By: Gorski

Gorski — Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:17:09 +0000

What, no figlet?

pretty awesome. the Catull “G” is a nice touch, especially for a Goooooooooogle employee.

is the +1… bit preceding an actual phone number? is the specified formatting different outside of the NANPA area–? I always expect +1 (aaa) xxx-nnnn for aaa area code, xxx exchange, nnnn number, but that wouldn’t be the case outside the US–I think Belgium is +32? and it’s not enough digits for a US (+1) phone number anyways. does that string have other significance?

peace,

–me

By: Dallas

Dallas — Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:38:08 +0000

Thats pretty cool. Very clever. I made some Moo business cards with my new blog URL, but they haven't been delivered yet. Dallass last blog post..Belgium Six Months Later - Part 2