I haven’t talked about it much on my blog yet, but two weeks ago I got my Nikon D300. I bought it primarily because my Nikon D70 was acting up, but having the latest & greatest in gadgets doesn’t hurt either. Of course, as I was boxing up the D70 to send back to the factory after a week of CHA errors, my old D70 began working again.
I’ll leave a full review for a later day, but I wanted to share one of the most amazing D300 features: AF Fine Tune. Over time, a lens may settle in, and it’s focus may not be exactly like it was at the factory. I prefer buying my lenses off of eBay, and have had pretty good luck except for one purchase: the Nikon AF 70-300 F/4.0-F/5.6G. The picture quality of this lens always sucked, but I just chalked it up to how cheap the lens was ($150). Internet reviews seemed to agree that this lens was garbage, but there were dissenters.
Since I left my birding lens (Sigma 50-500mm) in North Carolina over Thanksgiving break, I’ve been stuck with the 70-300mm for birding. The results were really bad, and even worse with the Kenko Pro 1.4X converter that I am using to bring the range up to 420mm. After reading several forums, I got to thinking that maybe the problem with my copy of this lens isn’t that it’s garbage, but that it’s auto-focus needs tuning.
Unlike most digital camera’s, the Nikon D300 allows you to fine-tune the AF of each individual lens in your collection. You plug the lens in, and select your compensation value (-20 to +20), take some photos, and see which one comes out the best. After reading the perfectionist approach to AF Fine Tuning, I decided to take things a bit more haphazardly. I simply slapped the D300 up on a tripod, extended the lens out to 300mm, set my aperture to F/5.6, and took some photos.
My first sample was a screwdriver with a label at -20, -10, -5, 0, +5, +10, +20, and inspected it on the computer. After comparing photos side by side, the photos between +15 and +20 looked the best. I photographed a label of Julmust at +13 to +20, and settled on +14 to +16 looking the best. I tried one more time with another DIMM, this time with flash. After looking at the photos on my computer, I decided that +15 was the perfect compensation amount for this lens.
You can see the difference between +0 and +15 in the photo attached to this entry. While it did not magically make the lens tack-sharp, there is a very clear difference in the amount of detail between the two shots. I’m really curious what it’s going to do for the 50-500mm.
Add New Comment
Viewing 3 Comments
Thanks. Your comment is awaiting approval by a moderator.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Add New Comment
Trackbacks
(Trackback URL)